UK Shared Prosperity Fund: guidance for applicants

Contents

- Introduction

- Purpose of the document

Objectives

- Application parameters

- Interventions

- Outputs and outcomes

- Self-declaration

- Completing the application form

- Scoring methodology

- UKSPF spending protocol

- Procurement

 

 

Introduction

1.1 The UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF or the Fund) is a central pillar of the UK government's ambitious Levelling Up agenda and a significant component of its support for places across the UK. It provides £2.6 billion of new funding for local investment by March 2025, with all areas of the UK receiving an allocation from the Fund via a funding formula rather than a competition. It will help places right across the country deliver enhanced outcomes and recognises that even the most affluent parts of the UK contain pockets of deprivation and need support.

1.2 The primary goal of the UKSPF is to build pride in place and increase life chances across the UK. This aligns with Levelling Up White Paper missions, particularly: 'By 2030, pride in place, such as people's satisfaction with their town centre and engagement in local culture and community, will have risen in every area of the UK, with the gap between the top performing and other areas closing.'

1.3 For further context the UK Shared Prosperity Fund: prospectus can be found on GOV.UK

1.4 Following acceptance of the council's investment plan submitted in August 2022, the council wishes to invite applicants to submit their project via the application process for the 2022-2023 funding round.

1.5 Submitted projects will be assessed by a Local Partnership Group comprising key stakeholders from the public and voluntary sector. The scoring methodology outlined in this guidance will be used to determine which projects are approved for funding.
 

Purpose of the document

2.1 This document has been developed to provide clarity on the strategic drivers, objectives and the rules and regulations set by the UKSPF prospectus the context of which should inform the responses provided by the applicant.

2.2 The document sets out the considerations which will need to be observed and provide clarity on how the applications will be assessed.

2.3 A self-declaration section has been included for applicants to complete which sets out the minimum standards required for a project to be considered compliant with the process.
 

Objectives

3.1 These key objectives of the process are:

3.1.1 Compliance with legislation and government standards, including the Public Contract Regulations 2015 (as amended);

3.1.2 Value for money;

3.1.3 Timely delivery; and

3.1.4 Optimisation of outputs and outcomes set by the UKSPF prospectus.
 

Application parameters

4.1 Projects for year 1 are only eligible under intervention E11 - Investment in capacity building and infrastructure support for local civil society and community groups

4.2 Year 2 and 3 of the process will enable applicants to apply under other agreed priority interventions. A call for projects for years 2 and 3 will be issued in due course.
 

Interventions

5.1 The interventions which were identified by the local stakeholder group can be found in the table below along with their associated objective and the available fund:

5.2 Projects for year 1 are only eligible under intervention E11 - Investment in capacity building and infrastructure support for local civil society and community groups

Investment Priority

Intervention

Objectives

Indicative Funding Available

Communities & Place

E6: Support for local arts, cultural, heritage and creative activities

Strengthening our social fabric and fostering a sense of local pride and belonging, through investment in activities that enhance physical, cultural and social ties and amenities, such as community infrastructure and local green space and community-led projects.

£70,500

E11: Investment in capacity building and infrastructure support for local civil society and community groups

 

£485,800

Supporting Local Business

E16: Investment in open markets and improvements to town centre retail and service sector infrastructure, with wraparound support for small businesses

 

Creating jobs and boosting community cohesion, through investments that build on existing industries and institutions, and range from support for starting businesses to visible improvements to local retail, hospitality and leisure sector facilities.

 

Increasing private sector investment in growth-enhancing activities, through targeted support for small and medium-sized businesses to undertake new-to-firm innovation, adopt productivity-enhancing, energy efficient and low carbon technologies and techniques, and start or grow their exports.

£99,500

People and Skills

E33: Employment support for economically inactive people

 

Supporting people furthest from the labour market to overcome barriers to work by providing cohesive, locally tailored support, including access to basic skills.

 

£63,450

E37: Tailored support to help people in employment, who are not supported by mainstream provision to address barriers to accessing education and training courses.

 

Supporting local areas to fund gaps in local skills provision to support people to progress in work, and supplement local adult skills provision e.g. by providing additional volumes; delivering provision through wider range of routes or enabling more intensive/innovative provision, both qualification based and non-qualification based. This should be supplementary to provision available through national employment and skills programmes.

 

£245,942

 

Outputs and outcomes

6.1 Once the relevant interventions(s) have been selected the applicant should review the outputs and outcomes to ensure they can achieve the requirements set by the Fund's performance requirements. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1068875/UKSPF_England_Outputs_and_Outcomes.pdf

6.2 The application process will assess projects on their ability to achieve tangible outputs and outcomes. Applicants will be required to provided quantified outputs (where necessary) and outcomes i.e. "24 jobs created" rather than "we will create jobs" or "yes".
 

Self-declaration

7.1 Please see a short list of pre-qualification criteria which is considered the minimum standard to proceed for completing an application.

  • your project aligns with the UDC UKSPF priority intervention E11
  • your project is ready to be delivered in line with the fund terms and conditions and can be completed by 31 March 2023 (year 1 only)
  • you can quantify the level of impact your project will have on the outputs & outcomes sought from the fund
  • you will comply with the procurement conditions set by UKSPF when spending funds for the following amounts.
    • up to £2500 - direct award
    • up to £25,000 - 3 quotes
    • more than £25,000  - formal tender
  • you have a project manager / senior responsible officer (SRO)
  • you are able to provide a risk analysis of the project proportionate to its size and nature
  • you have a firm understanding of the cost of the project and are confident that any fluctuation upwards in cost post award can be accommodated outside of the funding agreement
     

Completing the application form

8.1 The application form can be found on this website.

8.2 The form has been developed in compliance with the criteria set by the UKSPF prospectus, the Grants Standards and the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

8.3 Each question must be completed for the application to be considered.

8.4 Questions should be responded to proportionately based on the value and complexity of the project. Applications will not be advantaged through wordsmithing or word volume and will be assessed based on the responses' alignment to the criteria set in the question's guidance.

8.5 All questions must be answered openly, honestly and as comprehensively as possible. Failure to do so may result in funding not being awarded, being withheld or being reclaimed after payment has been made.
 

Scoring methodology

9.1 Applications will be reviewed objectively in line with the scoring criteria set out below. Responses will be assessed against the following criteria and the 5 key areas which will be scored and their allocated weightings are:

9.1.1.1 Outputs and outcomes - (35%)

9.1.1.2 Cost - (35%)

9.1.1.3 Risk analysis - (10%)

9.1.1.4 Added value - (12%)

9.1.1.5 Match funding - (8%)

9.1.2 Outputs and outcomes

Score

Criteria

0

The response does not relate to the question

1

The response does not contain any quantifiable benefits in line with the defined outputs and outcomes set by the prospectus

2

The response does indicate quantifiable benefits however the level of impact is considered proportionately low

3

The response does indicate a quantifiable benefit with an objectively high level of impact

4

The response indicates multiple quantifiable outcomes and outputs each of which offer a medium level of impact

5

The response indicates multiple quantifiable outcomes and outputs each of which offer a high level of impact

 

9.1.3 Cost

Score

Criteria

0

>£100k

1

>£80k-£100

2

>£60k-£80k

3

>£40k-£60k

4

>£20k-£40k

5

>£1 - £20k

 

9.1.4 Risk

Score

Criteria

0

The response does not relate to the question's requirements or has not been responded to

1

The response does not provide assurance that the risk has been assessed appropriately or proportionately

2

The response has not provided a proportionate risk assessment based on the size and complexity of the project which raises major concerns

3

The response has provided a proportionate risk assessment based on the size and complexity of the project which raises major concerns

4

The response has provided a proportionate risk assessment based on the size and complexity of the project which raises minor concerns

5

The response has provided a proportionate risk assessment based on the size and complexity of the project with no concerns raised

 

9.1.5 Added value

Score

Criteria

0

No response given

1

The response is not perceived to add any additional value in line with UDC's Corporate Plan

2

The response does indicate added value in line with UDC's Corporate Plan however the value has not been quantified

3

The response is considered to add minor value in a single area in line with UDC's Corporate Plan with a quantified outcome

4

The response is considered to add major value in a single area or minor in multiple areas in line with UDC's Corporate Plan with a quantified outcome

5

The response provides added value in multiple areas in line with UDC's Corporate Plan all of which have been quantified

 

9.1.6 Match funding

Score

Criteria

0

0%

1

>0% - 20%

2

>20% - 40%

3

>40% - 60%

4

>60% - 80%

5

>80% - 100%

 

9.2 If any of the scored questions do not meet the baseline requirement (i.e. 0 or 1) it is likely that the application will be rejected.
 

UKSPF spending protocol

10.1 Once applications are assessed they will be ranked based on the score achieved to provide clarity on the quality of the submissions.

10.2 These will then be aggregated to see where best value can be achieved when considering multiple projects. The cumulative impact of outcomes and outputs for different projects will be considered and projects may be batched accordingly.

10.3 The Council has responsibility for making decisions on the allocation of funding raised through UKSPF. The aim of this Protocol is to ensure that the decision-making process is transparent. Through it the Council and the Local Partnership Group will identify projects and allocate funds on an annual basis.
 

Procurement

11.1 Formal Tender Process - To spend fund monies in excess of £25k with a single supplier you will need to undergo a formal tender process for compliance with the fund's terms and conditions.

This will involve the following key activities where you will:

  • advertise the opportunity to as wide-reaching supplier base (within the district at minimum) as possible.
  • create criteria which assess cost and quality of suppliers against their peers.
  • operate an open/transparent process providing a fair opportunity for all suppliers to deliver the project's requirements.
  • score responses back from the suppliers to rank the submissions and find the preferred supplier/contractor.
  • report back the results of the process to support the fund's reporting procedures.